[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874nmkw1tu.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:02:05 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, andi@...stfloor.org, dsahern@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] perf hists browser: Add option for runtime switching perf data file
Hi Feng,
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:57:07 +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 08:17:03AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Em Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 04:20:53PM +0800, Feng Tang escreveu:
>> > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:11:21 +0900
>> > Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>> > > Ditto. Plus it might leak previous input_name.
>> >
>> > Nice catch, will check the return value of "strdup".
>> >
>> > For input_name mem leak, in some cases the input_name can't be called
>> > with free(), like those got from parse "-i" option. In case the old
>> > input_name is got from malloc through strdup, I think it's not a big
>> > issue given that buffer will be freed any way when the application exit.
>>
>> I think this is a matter of discipline, leaking is bad, kernel or
>> userspace, why special case it?
>>
>
> I see, then we need make sure all "input_name" point to a malloced buffer,
> here is a initial debug patch will only touch the annotate/report/script
> cmds, pls review and more suggestions are welcomed:
Well, how about adding a flag like "input_name_alloced" and checking it
before new allocation? This way we can avoid needless strdup when
runtime switching is not used.
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists