[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120927212444.GK16482@spo001.leaseweb.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 23:24:44 +0200
From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
To: Oskar Schirmer <oskar@...ra.com>
Cc: linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog/imx2+: add support for pretimeout interrupt functionality
Hi Oskar,
> unless there is another issue with this patch,
> could You give an ack now?
>
> thanks,
> Oskar
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 15:37:24 +0000, Oskar Schirmer wrote:
> > This watchdog device provides pretimeout facilities:
> > Set some timeout value and get informed about imminent
> > watchdog activity thru interrupt.
> >
> > Allow user to wait for this asynchronous event thru poll(2),
> > and to clear it implicitely upon dog appeasement.
> >
> > There is only one precedent in current kernel that implements
> > watchdog pretimeout, ipmi_watchdog. It provides pretimeout
> > event thru poll, and requires a read(2) call to clear it.
> >
> > However, as write(2) does calm the dog and so wind up the
> > timer anyway, it is obvious to let poll(2) state writability
> > where pretimeout has passed.
> [...]
No, I'm not givinbg this an ACK nor a NAK at this moment.
I will review best options after the next merge window.
Kind regards,
Wim.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists