lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1209271546460.13360@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:50:58 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
cc:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: Ignore internal flags in cache creation

On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> > I would suggest cachep->flags being used solely for the flags passed to
> > kmem_cache_create() and seperating out all "internal flags" based on the
> > individual slab allocator's implementation into a different field.  There
> > should be no problem with moving CFLGS_OFF_SLAB elsewhere, in fact, I just
> > removed a "dflags" field from mm/slab.c's kmem_cache that turned out never
> > to be used.  You could simply reintroduce a new "internal_flags" field and
> > use it at your discretion.
> 
> This means touching another field from critical paths of the allocators.
> It would increase the cache footprint and therefore reduce performance.
> 

To clarify your statement, you're referring to the mm/slab.c allocation of 
new slab pages and when debugging is enabled as "critical paths", correct?  
We would disagree on that point.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ