lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 01:01:48 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>, Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCHSET 00/15] perf report: Add support to accumulate hist periods On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 01:57:26PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Ping. Any comments for this? > > Arun, thanks for testing! > Namhyung When Arun was working on this, I asked him to explore if it could make sense to reuse the "-b, --branch-stack" perf report option. Because after all, this feature is doing about the same than "-b" except it's using callchains instead of full branch tracing. But callchains are branches. Just a limited subset of all branches taken on excecution. So you can probably reuse some interface and even ground code there. What do you think? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists