linux-kernel - [ 029/127] eCryptfs: Copy up attributes of the lower target inode after rename

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120928203049.232410101@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:33:22 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com>,
	Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Subject: [ 029/127] eCryptfs: Copy up attributes of the lower target inode after rename

3.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com>

commit 8335eafc2859e1a26282bef7c3d19f3d68868b8a upstream.

After calling into the lower filesystem to do a rename, the lower target
inode's attributes were not copied up to the eCryptfs target inode. This
resulted in the eCryptfs target inode staying around, rather than being
evicted, because i_nlink was not updated for the eCryptfs inode. This
also meant that eCryptfs didn't do the final iput() on the lower target
inode so it stayed around, as well. This would result in a failure to
free up space occupied by the target file in the rename() operation.
Both target inodes would eventually be evicted when the eCryptfs
filesystem was unmounted.

This patch calls fsstack_copy_attr_all() after the lower filesystem
does its ->rename() so that important inode attributes, such as i_nlink,
are updated at the eCryptfs layer. ecryptfs_evict_inode() is now called
and eCryptfs can drop its final reference on the lower inode.

http://launchpad.net/bugs/561129

Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com>
Tested-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/ecryptfs/inode.c |    5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
@@ -653,6 +653,7 @@ ecryptfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, s
 	struct dentry *lower_old_dir_dentry;
 	struct dentry *lower_new_dir_dentry;
 	struct dentry *trap = NULL;
+	struct inode *target_inode;
 
 	lower_old_dentry = ecryptfs_dentry_to_lower(old_dentry);
 	lower_new_dentry = ecryptfs_dentry_to_lower(new_dentry);
@@ -660,6 +661,7 @@ ecryptfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, s
 	dget(lower_new_dentry);
 	lower_old_dir_dentry = dget_parent(lower_old_dentry);
 	lower_new_dir_dentry = dget_parent(lower_new_dentry);
+	target_inode = new_dentry->d_inode;
 	trap = lock_rename(lower_old_dir_dentry, lower_new_dir_dentry);
 	/* source should not be ancestor of target */
 	if (trap == lower_old_dentry) {
@@ -675,6 +677,9 @@ ecryptfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, s
 			lower_new_dir_dentry->d_inode, lower_new_dentry);
 	if (rc)
 		goto out_lock;
+	if (target_inode)
+		fsstack_copy_attr_all(target_inode,
+				      ecryptfs_inode_to_lower(target_inode));
 	fsstack_copy_attr_all(new_dir, lower_new_dir_dentry->d_inode);
 	if (new_dir != old_dir)
 		fsstack_copy_attr_all(old_dir, lower_old_dir_dentry->d_inode);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/