[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50655433.7000108@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:39:31 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] memory_hotplug: Don't modify the zone_start_pfn outside
of zone_span_writelock()
Hi, KOSAKI
On 09/28/2012 06:30 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> (9/27/12 2:47 AM), Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> The __add_zone() maybe call sleep-able init_currently_empty_zone()
>> to init wait_table,
>
> This doesn't explain why sleepable is critical important. I think sleepable
> is jsut unrelated. The fact is only: to write zone->zone_start_pfn require
> zone_span_writelock, but init_currently_empty_zone() doesn't take it.
You are right, sleepable is not critical important, but the lock is critical.
I am Sorry that I added "sleep-able" and misled guys.
Actually I want to say:
1) to write zone->zone_start_pfn require zone_span_writelock
2) init_currently_empty_zone() is sleepable, so we can't use zone_span_writelock()
protect the whole init_currently_empty_zone().
3) so we have to move the modification code out of init_currently_empty_zone()
as this patch does.
>
>
>>
>> But this function also modifies the zone_start_pfn without any lock.
>> It is bugy.
>
> buggy?
>
>
>> So we move this modification out, and we ensure the modification
>> of zone_start_pfn is only done with zone_span_writelock() held or in booting.
>>
>> Since zone_start_pfn is not modified by init_currently_empty_zone()
>> grow_zone_span() needs to check zone_start_pfn before update it.
>>
>> CC: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
>> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
>> Reported-by: Yasuaki ISIMATU <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
>> Tested-by: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 2 +-
>> mm/page_alloc.c | 3 +--
>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> index b62d429b..790561f 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static void grow_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
>> zone_span_writelock(zone);
>>
>> old_zone_end_pfn = zone->zone_start_pfn + zone->spanned_pages;
>> - if (start_pfn < zone->zone_start_pfn)
>> + if (!zone->zone_start_pfn || start_pfn < zone->zone_start_pfn)
>> zone->zone_start_pfn = start_pfn;
>
> Wrong. zone->zone_start_pfn==0 may be valid pfn. You shouldn't assume it is uninitialized
> value.
Good catch, I will use zone->spanned_pages instead.
Thanks,
Lai
>
>
>>
>> zone->spanned_pages = max(old_zone_end_pfn, end_pfn) -
>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> index c13ea75..2545013 100644
>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> @@ -3997,8 +3997,6 @@ int __meminit init_currently_empty_zone(struct zone *zone,
>> return ret;
>> pgdat->nr_zones = zone_idx(zone) + 1;
>>
>> - zone->zone_start_pfn = zone_start_pfn;
>> -
>> mminit_dprintk(MMINIT_TRACE, "memmap_init",
>> "Initialising map node %d zone %lu pfns %lu -> %lu\n",
>> pgdat->node_id,
>> @@ -4465,6 +4463,7 @@ static void __paginginit free_area_init_core(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
>> ret = init_currently_empty_zone(zone, zone_start_pfn,
>> size, MEMMAP_EARLY);
>> BUG_ON(ret);
>> + zone->zone_start_pfn = zone_start_pfn;
>> memmap_init(size, nid, j, zone_start_pfn);
>> zone_start_pfn += size;
>> }
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists