linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH scsi] Add NULL checking of return value from scsi_cmd_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 28 Sep 2012 08:48:18 +0100
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To:	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc:	Li Zhong <zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH scsi] Add NULL checking of return value from
 scsi_cmd_to_driver()

On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 13:41 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>> "James" == James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> writes:
> 
> >> I'm fine with having the eh action be triggered for FS requests only,
> >> if that's what you're asking?
> 
> James> Sort of ... I was thinking do it for all non REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC
> James> commands (which includes flush and other strange types), but if
> James> you think it should only be for REQ_TYPE_FS, that's fine too.
> 
> I'm ok either way.

OK, let's mirror the code in scsi.c then, so != REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/