[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50655A29.1050303@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:04:57 +0800
From: Ni zhan Chen <nizhan.chen@...il.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] memory_hotplug: Don't modify the zone_start_pfn outside
of zone_span_writelock()
On 09/28/2012 03:29 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Hi, Chen,
>
> On 09/27/2012 09:19 PM, Ni zhan Chen wrote:
>> On 09/27/2012 02:47 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>>> The __add_zone() maybe call sleep-able init_currently_empty_zone()
>>> to init wait_table,
>>>
>>> But this function also modifies the zone_start_pfn without any lock.
>>> It is bugy.
>>>
>>> So we move this modification out, and we ensure the modification
>>> of zone_start_pfn is only done with zone_span_writelock() held or in booting.
>>>
>>> Since zone_start_pfn is not modified by init_currently_empty_zone()
>>> grow_zone_span() needs to check zone_start_pfn before update it.
>>>
>>> CC: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
>>> Reported-by: Yasuaki ISIMATU <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
>>> Tested-by: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
>>> ---
>>> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 2 +-
>>> mm/page_alloc.c | 3 +--
>>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>> index b62d429b..790561f 100644
>>> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>> @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static void grow_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
>>> zone_span_writelock(zone);
>>> old_zone_end_pfn = zone->zone_start_pfn + zone->spanned_pages;
>>> - if (start_pfn < zone->zone_start_pfn)
>>> + if (!zone->zone_start_pfn || start_pfn < zone->zone_start_pfn)
>>> zone->zone_start_pfn = start_pfn;
>>> zone->spanned_pages = max(old_zone_end_pfn, end_pfn) -
>>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
>>> index c13ea75..2545013 100644
>>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>>> @@ -3997,8 +3997,6 @@ int __meminit init_currently_empty_zone(struct zone *zone,
>>> return ret;
>>> pgdat->nr_zones = zone_idx(zone) + 1;
>>> - zone->zone_start_pfn = zone_start_pfn;
>>> -
>> then how can mminit_dprintk print zone->zone_start_pfn ? always print 0 make no sense.
>
> The full code here:
>
> mminit_dprintk(MMINIT_TRACE, "memmap_init",
> "Initialising map node %d zone %lu pfns %lu -> %lu\n",
> pgdat->node_id,
> (unsigned long)zone_idx(zone),
> zone_start_pfn, (zone_start_pfn + size));
>
>
> It doesn't always print 0, it still behaves as I expected.
> Could you elaborate?
Yeah, you are right. I mean mminit_dprintk is called after
zone->zone_start_pfn initialized to show initialising state, but after
this patch applied zone->zone_start_pfn will not be initialized before
this print point.
>
> Thanks,
> Lai
>
>
>>> mminit_dprintk(MMINIT_TRACE, "memmap_init",
>>> "Initialising map node %d zone %lu pfns %lu -> %lu\n",
>>> pgdat->node_id,
>>> @@ -4465,6 +4463,7 @@ static void __paginginit free_area_init_core(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
>>> ret = init_currently_empty_zone(zone, zone_start_pfn,
>>> size, MEMMAP_EARLY);
>>> BUG_ON(ret);
>>> + zone->zone_start_pfn = zone_start_pfn;
>>> memmap_init(size, nid, j, zone_start_pfn);
>>> zone_start_pfn += size;
>>> }
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists