linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 46/57] power: chargealg: Realign with upstream version

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:17:00 -0700
From:	Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>
To:	mathieu.poirier@...aro.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dwmw2@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 46/57] power: chargealg: Realign with upstream version

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:12:43AM -0600, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org wrote:
> From: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@...ricsson.com>
> 
> Upstream version of AB charge algo has been reverted
> during kernel 3.4 port.

Why it's been reverted in the first place?.. If you're just reverting what
has been reverted before, you're probably breaking things again, so the
patch would [temporary] introduce some breakage?

> This patch restore state by:
> - renaming ab8500_chargal.c in abx500_chargal.c
> - renaming function from ab8500 to abx500
> - moving generic structure in "include/mfd/abx500.h"
> 
> Goal is to ease next code reversion and realignment
> with mainline

I still hardly understand the rationale behind this change. But if it
compiles, bisectionable and works... it's fine by me. :-)

> 
> Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@...ricsson.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Philippe LANGLAIS <philippe.langlais@...ricsson.com>
> ---
>  drivers/power/ab8500_charger.c       |  166 +++++++++++-----------------------
>  include/linux/mfd/abx500.h           |   10 ++-
>  include/linux/mfd/abx500/ab8500-bm.h |    5 +-
>  3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 116 deletions(-)
> 
[...]
> @@ -2678,7 +2616,7 @@ static void ab8500_charger_vbus_drop_end_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct ab8500_charger *di = container_of(work,
>  		struct ab8500_charger, vbus_drop_end_work.work);
> -	int ret;
> +	int ret, curr;

Should be one variable declaration per line.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/