[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50657356.4010801@antcom.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:52:22 +0200
From: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
w.sang@...gutronix.de, jbe@...gutronix.de,
Bill Gatliff <bgat@...lgatliff.com>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] gpio: Add a block GPIO API to gpiolib
On 09/28/2012 11:14 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> @@ -686,6 +731,13 @@ read-only attributes:
>>
>> "ngpio" ... how many GPIOs this manges (N to N + ngpio - 1)
>>
>> + "block" ... get/set Block GPIO:
>> + * reads: space separated list of GPIO inputs of this chip that
>> + are set to 1, e.g. "83 85 87 99"
>> + * write: space separated list of GPIO outputs of this chip
>> + that are to be set or cleared, e.g. "80 -83 -85" (prefix
>> + "-" clears)
>
> This sort of breaks the sysfs convention of one value per file,
> does it not?
>
> It's not like I have some better idea, just we need to think about
> other possible solutions.
>
> The GPIO sysfs interface is not universally liked. What are the
> typical applications you have for this? Industrial control by
> bit-banging userspace processes?
Yes, I had several projects in the past with the need of setting groups
of GPIOs at once (typically, 8 bit busses via GPIO lines), so needed to
provide some hacks. Don't want to do this over and over again. :-)
Bit-banging in kernel and userspace.
It's hard to do the one-value-per-file right for a several-gpios-at-once
goal. :-) I originally had a one-value solution: A bit map, continuously
hex coded, like in the original kernel API idea (e.g. 0x000F0A0010).
Wasn't sure because it encodes GPIO numbers in a weird way.
Strictly formally: Isn't a comma-separated list of a GPIO block (e.g.
"80,81,85") a singe value in a sense? :-) Or other possibilities? Maybe
some node in /proc? Or some kind of new character device node?
Otherwise, I need to think about leaving out the sysfs for this purpose.
Thanks in advance,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists