lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:32:32 +0200
From:	Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
To:	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
CC:	linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	w.sang@...gutronix.de, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] gpio: Add a block GPIO API to gpiolib

On 09/28/2012 12:28 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>> gpio0 = {1};
>> set0 = {1};
>>
>> gpio1 = {33, 34};
> here should be
> 
> pin0 = {1};
> set0 = {1};
> 
> pin1 = {1, 2, 23};
> set1 = {0, 0, 1};
> 
> set_blocks(gpio_chip0, pin0, set0, 1);
> set_blocks(gpio_chip1, pin1, set1, 3);
> 
> You may need to add a prepare to do not do the conversion between array and
> gpio_chip array as I guess you will work on gpio block with multiple time
> acces

Maybe like this, for some struct block *?

block = set_block_prepare(gc, pins, values, size);
if (block) {
	set_block(gc, block);
	...
	set_block_unprepare(gc, block);
}

Would mean that all supported drivers would need to implement those 3
new functions... Need to be careful about not introducing bloat...

Thanks,

Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ