[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120928124810.GB25916@amit.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:18:10 +0530
From: Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>
To: sjur.brandeland@...ricsson.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, sjurbren@...ricsson.com,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 0/3] virtio_console: Add rproc_serial device
On (Tue) 25 Sep 2012 [15:47:14], sjur.brandeland@...ricsson.com wrote:
> From: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@...ricsson.com>
>
> I thought rebasing rproc_serial to linux-next was going to be trivial.
> But when starting the merge I realized that I had to refactor the
> the patches from Masami Hiramatsu. The splice support has the same issue
> as I faced, with different type of buffers in the out_vq.
> So I ended up refactoring the splice functionality. The code
> size got smaller so hopefully this a step in the right direction.
>
> This refactoring also make introduction of rproc_serial cleaner.
>
> As requested I also added a patch for not initializing buffers.
>
> I have tested the VIRTIO_CONSOLE device by looping large amount of data
> through character device and tty, with lockdep and slub-debug on.
> This looks stable for me. I've also done a simple test of splice.
Thanks; I just passed these patches through my testsuite and things
are working fine. I'll review them in some time.
Amit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists