linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/16] iommu/amd: Check if IOAPIC information is correct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:37:24 +0200
From:	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
To:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC:	<iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/16] iommu/amd: Check if IOAPIC information is correct

On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 10:16:45AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 02:23:54PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> +static bool __init check_ioapic_information(void)
> > +{
> > +	int idx;
> > +
> > +	for (idx = 0; idx < nr_ioapics; ++idx) {
> 
> That ++idx looks odd - and it looks like the file has a combination of
> i++ and ++i. Any particular reason for using this particular one instead
> of the more common: "idx++" ? Or just habit?

Well, it's just a habbit from my time with C++ :)

-- 
AMD Operating System Research Center

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach
General Managers: Alberto Bozzo
Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/