[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5065B84F.6060204@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:16:39 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
Conny Seidel <conny.seidel@....com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CPU hotplug, writeback: Don't call writeback_set_ratelimit()
too often during hotplug
On 09/28/2012 05:57 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:18:20AM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>>
>> From: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> The CPU hotplug callback related to writeback calls writeback_set_ratelimit()
>> during every state change in the hotplug sequence. This is unnecessary
>> since num_online_cpus() changes only once during the entire hotplug operation.
>>
>> So invoke the function only once per hotplug, thereby avoiding the
>> unnecessary repetition of those costly calculations.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>
> Looks good to me. I'll include it in the writeback tree.
>
Great, thanks!
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists