[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1348845559.3292.84.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:19:19 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
acme@...hat.com, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/31] perf, core: Add generic intx/intx_checkpointed
counter modifiers
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 16:53 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> If I moved this into sysfs this would imply that the perf stat -T
> code would become Haswell specific. As far as I understand normally
> you guys don't want things like that. Would everyone be ok with
> having specific code there?
Have a look at /sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpu/format/*, that's
already very hardware specific.
What I suggested is something like:
PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(intx, "config:32");
PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(intx_cp "config:33");
For the HSW+ cpus. That should be enough for userspace to create such
events.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists