[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5065CF4A.9070406@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:24:42 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Anmar Oueja <anmar.oueja@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: clarify idle vs sleep states
On 09/28/2012 01:18 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>
> This pure documentation fix tries to align the "idle" and
> "sleep" pin states to the idle and suspend states from
> runtime PM.
>
> Cc: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> ---
> ChangeLog v1->v2:
> - I changed my mind slightly after experimentation in practice
> (empirical stuff is the best). So now I think "idle" is for
> runtime_suspend(), and "sleep" is for suspend() proper. This
> works best in practice for us. I'm trying to set some model
> here that will be easy to understand and usable for typical
> cases.
Yes, I think this makes sense.
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists