[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5064EE3F.3080606@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:24:31 +0900
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
To: Ni zhan Chen <nizhan.chen@...il.com>
CC: <wency@...fujitsu.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <rientjes@...gle.com>,
<liuj97@...il.com>, <len.brown@...el.com>,
<benh@...nel.crashing.org>, <paulus@...ba.org>,
<minchan.kim@...il.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] memory-hotplug: add memory_block_release
Hi Chen,
2012/09/27 19:20, Ni zhan Chen wrote:
> Hi Congyang,
>
> 2012/9/27 <wency@...fujitsu.com>
>
>> From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
>>
>> When calling remove_memory_block(), the function shows following message at
>> device_release().
>>
>> Device 'memory528' does not have a release() function, it is broken and
>> must
>> be fixed.
>>
>
> What's the difference between the patch and original implemetation?
The implementation is for removing a memory_block. So the purpose is
same as original one. But original code is bad manner. kobject_cleanup()
is called by remove_memory_block() at last. But release function for
releasing memory_block is not registered. As a result, the kernel message
is shown. IMHO, memory_block should be release by the releae function.
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
>
>
>> remove_memory_block() calls kfree(mem). I think it shouled be called from
>> device_release(). So the patch implements memory_block_release()
>>
>> CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
>> CC: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
>> CC: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
>> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
>> CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
>> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
>> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>> CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
>> CC: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/base/memory.c | 9 ++++++++-
>> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c
>> index 7dda4f7..da457e5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/memory.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/memory.c
>> @@ -70,6 +70,13 @@ void unregister_memory_isolate_notifier(struct
>> notifier_block *nb)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_memory_isolate_notifier);
>>
>> +static void release_memory_block(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct memory_block *mem = container_of(dev, struct memory_block,
>> dev);
>> +
>> + kfree(mem);
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * register_memory - Setup a sysfs device for a memory block
>> */
>> @@ -80,6 +87,7 @@ int register_memory(struct memory_block *memory)
>>
>> memory->dev.bus = &memory_subsys;
>> memory->dev.id = memory->start_section_nr / sections_per_block;
>> + memory->dev.release = release_memory_block;
>>
>> error = device_register(&memory->dev);
>> return error;
>> @@ -630,7 +638,6 @@ int remove_memory_block(unsigned long node_id, struct
>> mem_section *section,
>> mem_remove_simple_file(mem, phys_device);
>> mem_remove_simple_file(mem, removable);
>> unregister_memory(mem);
>> - kfree(mem);
>> } else
>> kobject_put(&mem->dev.kobj);
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
>> the body to majordomo@...ck.org. For more info on Linux MM,
>> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
>> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists