[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwDWcQv9DBCQhMrcK-zx75qBN11iQhq5dxt+orosmeXbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:13:29 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
Cc: suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, dwmw2@...radead.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: mtd: kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/pat.c:279!
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com> wrote:
>
> I am not the maintainer, but please, go ahead an push your fix. I do not
> have time to test it myself and it does not look like anyone else in the
> small mtd community does.
Grr. I told people that patch wasn't tested. I hadn't even *compiled*
it. It has a typo ("inlint" instead of "inline" - so close).
Sasha said he had tested it, but nobody even mentioned this thing. Now
I'm nervous. I had committed it in my tree and was just about to push
it out when I decided that I should at least compile it despite the
"tested-by".
Hmm? Now I really *really* want to know that it's been tested on
actual hardware too. Sasha, what patch did you actually test? Did you
just fix the "inlint" thing, or was there something else entirely?
Linus
PS. Artem: your "Reply-to" is broken, and doesn't have your real name.
Please fix.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists