linux-kernel - Re: mtd: kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/pat.c:279!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5065FE29.5080302@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:44:41 +0200
From:	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, dwmw2@...radead.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: mtd: kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/pat.c:279!

On 09/28/2012 09:13 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> I am not the maintainer, but please, go ahead an push your fix. I do not
>> have time to test it myself and it does not look like anyone else in the
>> small mtd community does.
> 
> Grr. I told people that patch wasn't tested. I hadn't even *compiled*
> it. It has a typo ("inlint" instead of "inline" - so close).
> 
> Sasha said he had tested it, but nobody even mentioned this thing. Now
> I'm nervous. I had committed it in my tree and was just about to push
> it out when I decided that I should at least compile it despite the
> "tested-by".
> 
> Hmm? Now I really *really* want to know that it's been tested on
> actual hardware too. Sasha, what patch did you actually test? Did you
> just fix the "inlint" thing, or was there something else entirely?

I've just fixed the inlint thing since it was pretty trivial, I didn't bother commenting on it since I figured it would turn into
an actual patch from someone who could test it on actual hardware first.

Note that I've tested it on a KVM guest, and not on real hardware - so I'm not sure how much of a test that is.


Thanks,
Sasha

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/