lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50651B77.1070809@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:37:27 +0800
From:	Ni zhan Chen <nizhan.chen@...il.com>
To:	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, cmetcalf@...era.com,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, rientjes@...gle.com, liuj97@...il.com,
	len.brown@...el.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
	cl@...ux.com, minchan.kim@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v9 PATCH 05/21] memory-hotplug: check whether memory is
 present or not

On 09/11/2012 10:24 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> Hi Wen,
>
> 2012/09/11 11:15, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> Hi, ishimatsu
>>
>> At 09/05/2012 05:25 PM, wency@...fujitsu.com Wrote:
>>> From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
>>>
>>> If system supports memory hot-remove, online_pages() may online 
>>> removed pages.
>>> So online_pages() need to check whether onlining pages are present 
>>> or not.
>>
>> Because we use memory_block_change_state() to hotremoving memory, I 
>> think
>> this patch can be removed. What do you think?
>
> Pleae teach me detals a little more. If we use 
> memory_block_change_state(),
> does the conflict never occur? Why?

since memory hot-add or hot-remove is based on memblock, if check in 
memory_block_change_state()
can guarantee conflict never occur?

>
> Thansk,
> Yasuaki Ishimatsu
>
>> Thanks
>> Wen Congyang
>>
>>>
>>> CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
>>> CC: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
>>> CC: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
>>> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
>>> CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
>>> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
>>> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
>>> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>>> CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
>>> CC: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
>>> ---
>>>   include/linux/mmzone.h |   19 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>   mm/memory_hotplug.c    |   13 +++++++++++++
>>>   2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
>>> index 2daa54f..ac3ae30 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
>>> @@ -1180,6 +1180,25 @@ void sparse_init(void);
>>>   #define sparse_index_init(_sec, _nid)  do {} while (0)
>>>   #endif /* CONFIG_SPARSEMEM */
>>>
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
>>> +static inline int pfns_present(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long 
>>> nr_pages)
>>> +{
>>> +    int i;
>>> +    for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
>>> +        if (pfn_present(pfn + i))
>>> +            continue;
>>> +        else
>>> +            return -EINVAL;
>>> +    }
>>> +    return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +#else
>>> +static inline int pfns_present(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long 
>>> nr_pages)
>>> +{
>>> +    return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +#endif /* CONFIG_SPARSEMEM*/
>>> +
>>>   #ifdef CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES
>>>   bool early_pfn_in_nid(unsigned long pfn, int nid);
>>>   #else
>>> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>> index 49f7747..299747d 100644
>>> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>> @@ -467,6 +467,19 @@ int __ref online_pages(unsigned long pfn, 
>>> unsigned long nr_pages)
>>>       struct memory_notify arg;
>>>
>>>       lock_memory_hotplug();
>>> +    /*
>>> +     * If system supports memory hot-remove, the memory may have been
>>> +     * removed. So we check whether the memory has been removed or 
>>> not.
>>> +     *
>>> +     * Note: When CONFIG_SPARSEMEM is defined, pfns_present() become
>>> +     *       effective. If CONFIG_SPARSEMEM is not defined, 
>>> pfns_present()
>>> +     *       always returns 0.
>>> +     */
>>> +    ret = pfns_present(pfn, nr_pages);
>>> +    if (ret) {
>>> +        unlock_memory_hotplug();
>>> +        return ret;
>>> +    }
>>>       arg.start_pfn = pfn;
>>>       arg.nr_pages = nr_pages;
>>>       arg.status_change_nid = -1;
>>
>
>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ