[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120928.132911.321770401.hdk@igel.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:29:11 +0900 (JST)
From: Hideki EIRAKU <hdk@...l.co.jp>
To: nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@...esas.com
Cc: lethal@...ux-sh.org, magnus.damm@...il.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
horms@...ge.net.au, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com, matsu@...l.co.jp, dhobsong@...l.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iommu/shmobile: Add iommu driver for Renesas
IPMMU modules
Hi,
From: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@...esas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iommu/shmobile: Add iommu driver for Renesas IPMMU modules
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:07:00 +0900
>> +static inline void ipmmu_add_device(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +}
>
> Please use 'do { } while (0)'.
Do you mean using #define macro is better than this inline function?
I chose the inline function because:
- The function's argument type is checked by a compiler.
- Its output code should be exactly the same as a macro in this case.
- The Linux kernel coding style says "Generally, inline functions are
preferable to macros resembling functions."
>> + switch (size) {
>> + default:
>> + priv->tlb_enabled = 0;
>> + break;
>> + case 0x2000:
>> + ipmmu_reg_write(priv, IMTTBCR, 1);
>> + priv->tlb_enabled = 1;
>> + break;
>> + case 0x1000:
>> + ipmmu_reg_write(priv, IMTTBCR, 2);
>> + priv->tlb_enabled = 1;
>> + break;
>> + case 0x800:
>> + ipmmu_reg_write(priv, IMTTBCR, 3);
>> + priv->tlb_enabled = 1;
>> + break;
>> + case 0x400:
>> + ipmmu_reg_write(priv, IMTTBCR, 4);
>> + priv->tlb_enabled = 1;
>> + break;
>> + case 0x200:
>> + ipmmu_reg_write(priv, IMTTBCR, 5);
>> + priv->tlb_enabled = 1;
>> + break;
>> + case 0x100:
>> + ipmmu_reg_write(priv, IMTTBCR, 6);
>> + priv->tlb_enabled = 1;
>> + break;
>> + case 0x80:
>> + ipmmu_reg_write(priv, IMTTBCR, 7);
>> + priv->tlb_enabled = 1;
>> + break;
>> + }
>
> I thought that you could describe more briefly if ffs() is used.
This is simply converted from a hardware manual. ffs() can be used
like below:
bit = ffs(size);
if (bit >= 7 && bit <= 13 && (1 << bit) == size) {
ipmmu_reg_write(priv, IMTTBCR, 14 - bit);
priv->tlb_enabled = 1;
} else {
priv->tlb_enabled = 0;
}
Checking size is still needed because only 7 sizes are allowed here.
I think using switch() is easier to understand.
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SHMOBILE_IOMMU_L1SIZE_8192
>> +#define L1_SIZE 8192
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SHMOBILE_IOMMU_L1SIZE_4096
>> +#define L1_SIZE 4096
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SHMOBILE_IOMMU_L1SIZE_2048
>> +#define L1_SIZE 2048
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SHMOBILE_IOMMU_L1SIZE_1024
>> +#define L1_SIZE 1024
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SHMOBILE_IOMMU_L1SIZE_512
>> +#define L1_SIZE 512
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SHMOBILE_IOMMU_L1SIZE_256
>> +#define L1_SIZE 256
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SHMOBILE_IOMMU_L1SIZE_128
>> +#define L1_SIZE 128
>> +#endif
>
> I think that it was better to define by kconfig.
> For example, following codes.
>
> +config SHMOBILE_IOMMU_L1SIZE
> + hex
> + default "0x00002000" if SHMOBILE_IOMMU_L1SIZE_8192
> + default "0x00001000" if SHMOBILE_IOMMU_L1SIZE_4096
> + default "0x00000800" if SHMOBILE_IOMMU_L1SIZE_2048
> + default "0x00000400" if SHMOBILE_IOMMU_L1SIZE_1024
> + default "0x00000200" if SHMOBILE_IOMMU_L1SIZE_512
> + default "0x00000100" if SHMOBILE_IOMMU_L1SIZE_256
> + default "0x00000080" if SHMOBILE_IOMMU_L1SIZE_128
I did not know that way. It looks good for me too.
Thank you.
--
Hideki EIRAKU <hdk@...l.co.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists