lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:16:40 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [ 183/218] sched: Fix race in task_group()

3.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>

commit 8323f26ce3425460769605a6aece7a174edaa7d1 upstream.

Stefan reported a crash on a kernel before a3e5d1091c1 ("sched:
Don't call task_group() too many times in set_task_rq()"), he
found the reason to be that the multiple task_group()
invocations in set_task_rq() returned different values.

Looking at all that I found a lack of serialization and plain
wrong comments.

The below tries to fix it using an extra pointer which is
updated under the appropriate scheduler locks. Its not pretty,
but I can't really see another way given how all the cgroup
stuff works.

Reported-and-tested-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1340364965.18025.71.camel@twins
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 include/linux/init_task.h |   12 +++++++++++-
 include/linux/sched.h     |    5 ++++-
 kernel/sched/core.c       |    9 ++++++++-
 kernel/sched/sched.h      |   23 ++++++++++-------------
 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/init_task.h
+++ b/include/linux/init_task.h
@@ -123,8 +123,17 @@ extern struct group_info init_groups;
 
 extern struct cred init_cred;
 
+extern struct task_group root_task_group;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
+# define INIT_CGROUP_SCHED(tsk)						\
+	.sched_task_group = &root_task_group,
+#else
+# define INIT_CGROUP_SCHED(tsk)
+#endif
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
-# define INIT_PERF_EVENTS(tsk)					\
+# define INIT_PERF_EVENTS(tsk)						\
 	.perf_event_mutex = 						\
 		 __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(tsk.perf_event_mutex),		\
 	.perf_event_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(tsk.perf_event_list),
@@ -161,6 +170,7 @@ extern struct cred init_cred;
 	},								\
 	.tasks		= LIST_HEAD_INIT(tsk.tasks),			\
 	INIT_PUSHABLE_TASKS(tsk)					\
+	INIT_CGROUP_SCHED(tsk)						\
 	.ptraced	= LIST_HEAD_INIT(tsk.ptraced),			\
 	.ptrace_entry	= LIST_HEAD_INIT(tsk.ptrace_entry),		\
 	.real_parent	= &tsk,						\
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1279,6 +1279,9 @@ struct task_struct {
 	const struct sched_class *sched_class;
 	struct sched_entity se;
 	struct sched_rt_entity rt;
+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
+	struct task_group *sched_task_group;
+#endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS
 	/* list of struct preempt_notifier: */
@@ -2744,7 +2747,7 @@ extern int sched_group_set_rt_period(str
 extern long sched_group_rt_period(struct task_group *tg);
 extern int sched_rt_can_attach(struct task_group *tg, struct task_struct *tsk);
 #endif
-#endif
+#endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED */
 
 extern int task_can_switch_user(struct user_struct *up,
 					struct task_struct *tsk);
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1098,7 +1098,7 @@ void set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p,
 	 * a task's CPU. ->pi_lock for waking tasks, rq->lock for runnable tasks.
 	 *
 	 * sched_move_task() holds both and thus holding either pins the cgroup,
-	 * see set_task_rq().
+	 * see task_group().
 	 *
 	 * Furthermore, all task_rq users should acquire both locks, see
 	 * task_rq_lock().
@@ -7427,6 +7427,7 @@ void sched_destroy_group(struct task_gro
  */
 void sched_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
+	struct task_group *tg;
 	int on_rq, running;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	struct rq *rq;
@@ -7441,6 +7442,12 @@ void sched_move_task(struct task_struct
 	if (unlikely(running))
 		tsk->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, tsk);
 
+	tg = container_of(task_subsys_state_check(tsk, cpu_cgroup_subsys_id,
+				lockdep_is_held(&tsk->sighand->siglock)),
+			  struct task_group, css);
+	tg = autogroup_task_group(tsk, tg);
+	tsk->sched_task_group = tg;
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
 	if (tsk->sched_class->task_move_group)
 		tsk->sched_class->task_move_group(tsk, on_rq);
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -536,22 +536,19 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_id);
 /*
  * Return the group to which this tasks belongs.
  *
- * We use task_subsys_state_check() and extend the RCU verification with
- * pi->lock and rq->lock because cpu_cgroup_attach() holds those locks for each
- * task it moves into the cgroup. Therefore by holding either of those locks,
- * we pin the task to the current cgroup.
+ * We cannot use task_subsys_state() and friends because the cgroup
+ * subsystem changes that value before the cgroup_subsys::attach() method
+ * is called, therefore we cannot pin it and might observe the wrong value.
+ *
+ * The same is true for autogroup's p->signal->autogroup->tg, the autogroup
+ * core changes this before calling sched_move_task().
+ *
+ * Instead we use a 'copy' which is updated from sched_move_task() while
+ * holding both task_struct::pi_lock and rq::lock.
  */
 static inline struct task_group *task_group(struct task_struct *p)
 {
-	struct task_group *tg;
-	struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
-
-	css = task_subsys_state_check(p, cpu_cgroup_subsys_id,
-			lockdep_is_held(&p->pi_lock) ||
-			lockdep_is_held(&task_rq(p)->lock));
-	tg = container_of(css, struct task_group, css);
-
-	return autogroup_task_group(p, tg);
+	return p->sched_task_group;
 }
 
 /* Change a task's cfs_rq and parent entity if it moves across CPUs/groups */


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ