[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120928201522.870027961@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:16:43 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, CAI Qian <caiqian@...hat.com>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Zhouping Liu <zliu@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [ 186/218] time: Improve sanity checking of timekeeping inputs
3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
commit 4e8b14526ca7fb046a81c94002c1c43b6fdf0e9b upstream.
Unexpected behavior could occur if the time is set to a value large
enough to overflow a 64bit ktime_t (which is something larger then the
year 2262).
Also unexpected behavior could occur if large negative offsets are
injected via adjtimex.
So this patch improves the sanity check timekeeping inputs by
improving the timespec_valid() check, and then makes better use of
timespec_valid() to make sure we don't set the time to an invalid
negative value or one that overflows ktime_t.
Note: This does not protect from setting the time close to overflowing
ktime_t and then letting natural accumulation cause the overflow.
Reported-by: CAI Qian <caiqian@...hat.com>
Reported-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc: Zhouping Liu <zliu@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1344454580-17031-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
include/linux/ktime.h | 7 -------
include/linux/time.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/ktime.h
+++ b/include/linux/ktime.h
@@ -58,13 +58,6 @@ union ktime {
typedef union ktime ktime_t; /* Kill this */
-#define KTIME_MAX ((s64)~((u64)1 << 63))
-#if (BITS_PER_LONG == 64)
-# define KTIME_SEC_MAX (KTIME_MAX / NSEC_PER_SEC)
-#else
-# define KTIME_SEC_MAX LONG_MAX
-#endif
-
/*
* ktime_t definitions when using the 64-bit scalar representation:
*/
--- a/include/linux/time.h
+++ b/include/linux/time.h
@@ -107,11 +107,29 @@ static inline struct timespec timespec_s
return ts_delta;
}
+#define KTIME_MAX ((s64)~((u64)1 << 63))
+#if (BITS_PER_LONG == 64)
+# define KTIME_SEC_MAX (KTIME_MAX / NSEC_PER_SEC)
+#else
+# define KTIME_SEC_MAX LONG_MAX
+#endif
+
/*
* Returns true if the timespec is norm, false if denorm:
*/
-#define timespec_valid(ts) \
- (((ts)->tv_sec >= 0) && (((unsigned long) (ts)->tv_nsec) < NSEC_PER_SEC))
+static inline bool timespec_valid(const struct timespec *ts)
+{
+ /* Dates before 1970 are bogus */
+ if (ts->tv_sec < 0)
+ return false;
+ /* Can't have more nanoseconds then a second */
+ if ((unsigned long)ts->tv_nsec >= NSEC_PER_SEC)
+ return false;
+ /* Disallow values that could overflow ktime_t */
+ if ((unsigned long long)ts->tv_sec >= KTIME_SEC_MAX)
+ return false;
+ return true;
+}
extern void read_persistent_clock(struct timespec *ts);
extern void read_boot_clock(struct timespec *ts);
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ int do_settimeofday(const struct timespe
struct timespec ts_delta;
unsigned long flags;
- if ((unsigned long)tv->tv_nsec >= NSEC_PER_SEC)
+ if (!timespec_valid(tv))
return -EINVAL;
write_seqlock_irqsave(&timekeeper.lock, flags);
@@ -420,6 +420,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(do_settimeofday);
int timekeeping_inject_offset(struct timespec *ts)
{
unsigned long flags;
+ struct timespec tmp;
+ int ret = 0;
if ((unsigned long)ts->tv_nsec >= NSEC_PER_SEC)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -428,10 +430,17 @@ int timekeeping_inject_offset(struct tim
timekeeping_forward_now();
+ tmp = timespec_add(timekeeper.xtime, *ts);
+ if (!timespec_valid(&tmp)) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto error;
+ }
+
timekeeper.xtime = timespec_add(timekeeper.xtime, *ts);
timekeeper.wall_to_monotonic =
timespec_sub(timekeeper.wall_to_monotonic, *ts);
+error: /* even if we error out, we forwarded the time, so call update */
timekeeping_update(true);
write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper.lock, flags);
@@ -439,7 +448,7 @@ int timekeeping_inject_offset(struct tim
/* signal hrtimers about time change */
clock_was_set();
- return 0;
+ return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(timekeeping_inject_offset);
@@ -599,7 +608,20 @@ void __init timekeeping_init(void)
struct timespec now, boot;
read_persistent_clock(&now);
+ if (!timespec_valid(&now)) {
+ pr_warn("WARNING: Persistent clock returned invalid value!\n"
+ " Check your CMOS/BIOS settings.\n");
+ now.tv_sec = 0;
+ now.tv_nsec = 0;
+ }
+
read_boot_clock(&boot);
+ if (!timespec_valid(&boot)) {
+ pr_warn("WARNING: Boot clock returned invalid value!\n"
+ " Check your CMOS/BIOS settings.\n");
+ boot.tv_sec = 0;
+ boot.tv_nsec = 0;
+ }
seqlock_init(&timekeeper.lock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists