[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120929003239.GA14293@jtriplet-mobl1>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:32:39 -0700
From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@...ox.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christopher Li <sparse@...isli.org>,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Pavel Pisa <pisa@....felk.cvut.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/10] bug.h: Make BUILD_BUG_ON generate compile-time error
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 06:20:09PM -0500, Daniel Santos wrote:
> Negative sized arrays wont create a compile-time error in some cases
> starting with gcc 4.4 (e.g., inlined functions), but gcc 4.3 introduced
> the error function attribute that will. This patch modifies
> BUILD_BUG_ON to behave like BUILD_BUG already does, using the error
> function attribute so that you don't have to build the entire kernel to
> discover that you have a problem, and then enjoy trying to track it down
> from a link-time error.
Rather than doing both, and potentially producing two errors for the
same issue, how about using __compiletime_error only, and only using the
negative-sized array when __compiletime_error has no useful definition?
For instance, in compiler.h, when defining __compiletime_error as an
empty macro in the fallback case, you could define a
__compiletime_error_fallback() macro that declares a negative-sized
array; you could then define __compiletime_error_fallback() as an empty
macro when it doesn't exist.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists