[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120929200828.GD31527@game.jcrosoft.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 22:08:28 +0200
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc: David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
Jon Loeliger <jdl@....com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] kbuild: centralize .dts->.dtb rule
On 13:32 Fri 28 Sep , Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
>
> All architectures that use cmd_dtc do so in the same way. Move the build
> rule to a central location to avoid duplication.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
> ---
> Jean-Christophe,
> Moving the build rule to Makefile.lib rather than Makefile.build seems
> reasonable to me; the dtc-related logic is already in Makefile.lib, and
> for features where cmd_* is defined in Makefile.lib, the associated
> build rule is also defined there. I see no reason for this patch series
> to move all the dtc-related logic into Makefile.build.
build rules are in Makefile.build c to o , s to o etc...
so put it in Makefile.build is the correct place ditto fot the dtc cmd
Best Regards,
J.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists