lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <506659D7.9080904@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:15:51 +0800
From:	Ni zhan Chen <nizhan.chen@...il.com>
To:	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	x86@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, cmetcalf@...era.com,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, rientjes@...gle.com, liuj97@...il.com,
	len.brown@...el.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
	cl@...ux.com, minchan.kim@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v9 PATCH 13/21] memory-hotplug: check page type in get_page_bootmem

On 09/05/2012 05:25 PM, wency@...fujitsu.com wrote:
> From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
>
> The function get_page_bootmem() may be called more than one time to the same
> page. There is no need to set page's type, private if the function is not
> the first time called to the page.
>
> Note: the patch is just optimization and does not fix any problem.

Hi Yasuaki,

this patch is reasonable to me. I have another question associated to 
get_page_bootmem(), the question is from another fujitsu guy's patch 
changelog [commit : 04753278769f3], the changelog said  that:

  1) When the memmap of removing section is allocated on other
      section by bootmem, it should/can be free.
  2) When the memmap of removing section is allocated on the
      same section, it shouldn't be freed. Because the section has to be
      logical memory offlined already and all pages must be isolated against
      page allocater. If it is freed, page allocator may use it which will
      be removed physically soon.

but I don't see his patch guarantee 2), it means that his patch doesn't 
guarantee the memmap of removing section which is allocated on other 
section by bootmem doesn't be freed. Hopefully get your explaination in 
details, thanks in advance. :-)

>
> CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> CC: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
> CC: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> CC: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
>   mm/memory_hotplug.c |   15 +++++++++++----
>   1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index d736df3..26a5012 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -95,10 +95,17 @@ static void release_memory_resource(struct resource *res)
>   static void get_page_bootmem(unsigned long info,  struct page *page,
>   			     unsigned long type)
>   {
> -	page->lru.next = (struct list_head *) type;
> -	SetPagePrivate(page);
> -	set_page_private(page, info);
> -	atomic_inc(&page->_count);
> +	unsigned long page_type;
> +
> +	page_type = (unsigned long)page->lru.next;
> +	if (page_type < MEMORY_HOTPLUG_MIN_BOOTMEM_TYPE ||
> +	    page_type > MEMORY_HOTPLUG_MAX_BOOTMEM_TYPE){
> +		page->lru.next = (struct list_head *)type;
> +		SetPagePrivate(page);
> +		set_page_private(page, info);
> +		atomic_inc(&page->_count);
> +	} else
> +		atomic_inc(&page->_count);
>   }
>   
>   /* reference to __meminit __free_pages_bootmem is valid

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ