[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <506662DD.4030309@oracle.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:54:21 +0800
From: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
levinsasha928@...il.com, Feng Jin <joe.jin@...cle.com>,
dan.carpenter@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] mm: frontswap: fix a wrong if condition in frontswap_shrink
On 2012-09-28 22:54, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 11:43 +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
>> On 2012-09-27 19:35, Paul Bolle wrote:
>>> I think setting pages_to_unuse to zero here is not needed. It is
>>> initiated to zero in frontswap_shrink() and hasn't been touched since.
>>> See my patch at https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/27/250.
>> Yes, it's unneeded. But I didn't see warning as you said in above link
>> when run 'make V=1 mm/frontswap.o'.
> Not even before applying your patch? Anyhow, after applying your patch
> the warnings gone here too.
I tested both cases, no warning, also didn't see -Wmaybe-uninitialized
when make.
My env is el5. gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-52)
Maybe your gcc built in/implicit spec use that option?
thanks
zduan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists