[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5066680E.3090907@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:16:30 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
CC: "zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com" <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86: mtrr: Constrain WB MTRR to max phys mem prior to cleanup
On 09/28/2012 10:37 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
>
> An interesting side note: more recent revisions of this BIOS (rev. A11)
> report one less variable MTRR (so, IA32_MTRRCAP is writable?)
>
>>> However, the right way to fix that is to use the PAT interfaces, which
>>> doesn't have this drawback -- then MTRR cleanup becomes entirely
>>> superfluous and the problem goes away.
>> Do you mean disable MTRR totally here?
>
> Well, since PAT entries marked WC override all MTRR settings, whatever
> the BIOS set the variable MTRRs to becomes irrelevant, so not disabled
> but rather ignored.
>
The whole point is that the display stuff should not use MTRR, but
rather use PAT to provide WC. Then we don't need to "clean up" the
BIOS-set MTRRs.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists