lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 29 Sep 2012 07:51:11 +0200
From:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loop: Make explicit loop device destruction lazy

On 2012-09-28 16:38, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 10:41:50AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> 
>  > > Turns out that blkid is running simultaneously with losetup -d, and
>  > > so it sees an elevated reference count and returns EBUSY.  But why
>  > > is blkid running? It's obvious, isn't it? udev has decided to try
>  > > and find out what is on the block device as a result of a creation
>  > > notification. And it is racing with mkfs, so might still be scanning
>  > > the device when mkfs finishes and we try to tear it down.
>  > > 
>  > I hear that %^#@#! blkid behavior, it is such a pain in the neck. I
>  > don't know how many times I've had to explain that behaviour to people
>  > who run write testing with tracing, wonder wtf there are reads in the
>  > trace.
>  
> Could this problem explain this bug too ? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853674

It certainly looks like it!

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists