linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <29451.1348903010@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:	Sat, 29 Sep 2012 08:16:50 +0100
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au,
	pjones@...hat.com, jwboyer@...hat.com,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...ux-nfs.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing

Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:

> I noticed the Cert number didn't change with rebuilds: "distclean"
> didn't remove some files:
> 
> $ git clean -f -f -x -d
> Removing extra_certificates
> Removing signing_key.priv
> Removing signing_key.x509
> Removing signing_key.x509.keyid
> Removing signing_key.x509.signer
> Removing x509.genkey

I'm not sure whether distclean should remove those, since they can be
externally supplied, or whether x509.genkey should have a Makefile dependency
on kernel/Makefile.

I lean towards 'yes' when I'm altering kernel/Makefile trying to get things
right, and 'no' when I'm doing a make distclean to change my config or
changing kernel/Makefile for some unrelated reason.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/