| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20120930120516.29be3022@endymion.delvare> Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 12:05:16 +0200 From: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org> To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, Linux-Next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [-next]: s390 *_irq() link errors On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:35:41 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org> wrote: > > On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:08:41 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org> wrote: > >> > I thought we were trying to move away from explicit arch exclusions, > >> > but if S390 is special then fine with me. I've folded Heiko's fix into > >> > >> "depends on GENERIC_HARDIRQS" is the alternative... > > > > That would make even less sense to me, I2C can work just fine without > > IRQs. > > For the individual drivers that need it... Oh, of course. Sorry I was probably not completely awaken ;) Either way is fine with me if it makes developers and users happy. -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists