[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50682D9E.4060102@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 13:31:42 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
CC: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
Christian Hoffmann <email@...istianhoffmann.info>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, johnstul@...ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: { 1} (detected
by 0, t=10002 jiffies)
On 09/30/2012 01:18 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 01:10:55PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 09/28/2012 05:35 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:40:44PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:28:50PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:54:00AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>> >> > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:45:43AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> >> > > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 04:15:01PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>> >
>> > [ . . . ]
>> >
>> >> > > > But could you also please send your .config file and a description of
>> >> > >
>> >> > > .config attached.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > the workload you are running?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > It's basically the below commands. The exact initrd is not relevant in
>> >> > > this case because it's a boot time warning before user space is
>> >> > > started. The stalls roughly happen 1 time on every 10 boots.
>> >> >
>> >> > Yow!!!
>> >> >
>> >> > You have severe cross-CPU time-synchronization problems. See for
>> >> > example the first dmesg, with the relevant part extracted right here.
>> >> > One CPU believes that it is about 37 seconds past boot, and the other
>> >> > CPU beleives that it is about 137 seconds past boot. Given that large
>> >> > of a time difference, an RCU CPU stall warning is expected behavior.
>> >>
>> >> Good spot! Yeah I noticed that huge timestamp gap, however didn't take
>> >> it seriously enough..
>> >>
>> >> > Get your two CPUs in agreement about what time it is, and I bet that
>> >> > the CPU stall warnings will go away.
>> >>
>> >> Possibly KVM related? Because the warnings show up in many test boxes
>> >> running KVM and so is not likely some hardware specific issue.
>> >
>> > I vaguely recall seeing something recently. But let's ask the KVM and
>> > timekeeping guys.
>>
>> >From the logs it looks like hpet (why not kvmclock?) is used for the
>
> Hi Avi! Thanks for looking into this. It seems you have the full logs
> attached in my previous email?
>
> FYI, I've enabled CONFIG_KVM_CLOCK/CONFIG_KVM_GUEST for all bootable
> kernels and here is the related boot message:
>
> [ 0.000000] kvm-clock: Using msrs 4b564d01 and 4b564d00
> [ 0.000000] kvm-clock: cpu 0, msr 0:1b7ec81, boot clock
>
>> clock, it should not generate such drifts since it is a global clock.
>> Can you verify current_clocksource on a boot that actually failed (in
>> case the clocksource is switched during runtime)?
>
> I see a line
>
> [ 2.011710] Switching to clocksource kvm-clock
>
> w/o any indication of errors.
So, with kvmclock it works and with hpet it fails? Strange, hpet is
simple while kvmclock is more complicated, I'd have expected the
opposite behaviour.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists