linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/11] x86/xen: Register resources required by kexec-tools

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <50698111020000780009EB2E@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date:	Mon, 01 Oct 2012 10:40:01 +0100
From:	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To:	"Daniel Kiper" <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>,
	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc:	<andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>, <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] x86/xen: Register resources required by
 kexec-tools

>>> On 28.09.12 at 18:21, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:06:32PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>> +	for (i = 0; i < cpus; ++i) {
> 
> Any specific reason for using '++i' instead of 'i++' ?

For people occasionally also writing C++ code this is the
canonical form.

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/