[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121001094554.GA19112@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 11:45:55 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, riel@...hat.com,
oleg@...hat.com, pjt@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
Lee.Schermerhorn@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/19] mm/mpol: Add MPOL_MF_NOOP
* Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> > From: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>
> >
> > This patch augments the MPOL_MF_LAZY feature by adding a
> > "NOOP" policy to mbind(). When the NOOP policy is used with
> > the 'MOVE and 'LAZY flags, mbind() [check_range()] will walk
> > the specified range and unmap eligible pages so that they
> > will be migrated on next touch.
>
> This patch is mistitled. The new flag is MPOL_NOOP. That made
> it difficult to find the commit in linux-next. Does it make
> sense to fix the patch title before this hits mainline?
In isolation such a minor title problem alone does not justify
rebasing.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists