lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 1 Oct 2012 11:45:55 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, riel@...hat.com,
	oleg@...hat.com, pjt@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	Lee.Schermerhorn@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/19] mm/mpol: Add MPOL_MF_NOOP


* Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> > From: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>
> >
> > This patch augments the MPOL_MF_LAZY feature by adding a 
> > "NOOP" policy to mbind().  When the NOOP policy is used with 
> > the 'MOVE and 'LAZY flags, mbind() [check_range()] will walk 
> > the specified range and unmap eligible pages so that they 
> > will be migrated on next touch.
> 
> This patch is mistitled. The new flag is MPOL_NOOP. That made 
> it difficult to find the commit in linux-next. Does it make 
> sense to fix the patch title before this hits mainline?

In isolation such a minor title problem alone does not justify 
rebasing.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ