[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121001101859.GC4360@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 11:19:00 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: silence GCC warning
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:16:46PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 11:03 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Have you reported this bug in GCC?
> No I haven't. Since you ask, I guess you too think 'ret' is always set
> when this function returns, don't you? Ie, my analysis isn't obviously
> wrong.
I haven't actually stared hard enough at the code to figure this out
yet but given what you're changing I'd hope it's a flow analysis bug.
I'm certainly not seeing a warning here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists