linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/16] iommu/amd: Add initialization routines for AMD interrupt remapping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKocOOOpN413i+yET-7-TSR6dHnkp5+EzDkaO7DmoCRnc-iMGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 1 Oct 2012 10:02:18 -0600
From:	Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@...il.com>
To:	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Cc:	iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/16] iommu/amd: Add initialization routines for AMD
 interrupt remapping

On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 05:18:18PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> > +void amd_iommu_disable(void)
>> > +{
>> > +       amd_iommu_suspend();
>>
>> Is it safe to attempt to suspend when iommu is in suspend state? In
>> other words what happens if amd_iommu_disable() gets called when iommu
>> is already in suspend state?
>
> Yes, this is safe. It just trns a bit to 0 which is already 0.
>
Good.
>>> > +int amd_iommu_reenable(int mode)
>> > +{
>> > +       amd_iommu_resume();
>>
>> Same question as above. Safe to do a resume, when in resumed state?
>
> Safe too, it just writes values to the hardware which are already there.
> This was also proven by testing.
>

Thanks. Sounds good.

-- Shuah
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/