linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] slab: Ignore internal flags in cache creation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0000013a1d76c065-7134a937-7892-40df-80bd-e7189eff7e4c-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date:	Mon, 1 Oct 2012 17:54:12 +0000
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
cc:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: Ignore internal flags in cache creation

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, David Rientjes wrote:

> All of the move to mm/slab_common.c has obviously slowed down posting of
> SLAM and I haven't complained about that once or asked that it not be
> done, I'm simply pointing out an instance here that will conflict later on
> if we go with this patch.  That, to me, is respectful of other people's
> time.  That said, I'll leave it to Glauber to decide how he'd like to
> handle this issue given the knowledge of what is to come.

I do not mind if you post a version against some older kernel. We can
then see what is going on and come to an agreement on how to move forward.
I just want to finally *see* the patches instead of just hot talk.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/