linux-kernel - RE: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] TPM: Issue TPM_STARTUP at driver load if the TPM has not been started

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 1 Oct 2012 09:17:28 +0000
From:	<Peter.Huewe@...ineon.com>
To:	<jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: RE: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] TPM: Issue TPM_STARTUP at driver load if
 the TPM has not been started

Hi Jason,

> The TPM will respond to TPM_GET_CAP with TPM_ERR_INVALID_POSTINIT if
> TPM_STARTUP has not been issued. This will result in the TPM driver
> failing to load and no way to recover. Detect this and automatically
> issue TPM_STARTUP.

> This is for embedded applications where the kernel is the first thing
> to touch the TPM.

Thanks for working on this.
I also thought about this scenario quite often.

Shouldn't we then also add a TpmStartup(ST_STATE) in case of a resume?
 rc=GetCapability()
 if(rc==INVALID_POSTINIT)
 	tpm_transmit ("TPM_STARTUP(ST_STATE)")...

Thanks,
Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/