linux-kernel - [ 112/180] cipso: dont follow a NULL pointer when setsockopt() is called

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20121001225202.353059505@1wt.eu>
Date:	Tue, 02 Oct 2012 00:53:49 +0200
From:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Lin Ming <mlin@...pku.edu.cn>, Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: [ 112/180] cipso: dont follow a NULL pointer when setsockopt() is called

2.6.32-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit 89d7ae34cdda4195809a5a987f697a517a2a3177 ]

As reported by Alan Cox, and verified by Lin Ming, when a user
attempts to add a CIPSO option to a socket using the CIPSO_V4_TAG_LOCAL
tag the kernel dies a terrible death when it attempts to follow a NULL
pointer (the skb argument to cipso_v4_validate() is NULL when called via
the setsockopt() syscall).

This patch fixes this by first checking to ensure that the skb is
non-NULL before using it to find the incoming network interface.  In
the unlikely case where the skb is NULL and the user attempts to add
a CIPSO option with the _TAG_LOCAL tag we return an error as this is
not something we want to allow.

A simple reproducer, kindly supplied by Lin Ming, although you must
have the CIPSO DOI #3 configure on the system first or you will be
caught early in cipso_v4_validate():

	#include <sys/types.h>
	#include <sys/socket.h>
	#include <linux/ip.h>
	#include <linux/in.h>
	#include <string.h>

	struct local_tag {
		char type;
		char length;
		char info[4];
	};

	struct cipso {
		char type;
		char length;
		char doi[4];
		struct local_tag local;
	};

	int main(int argc, char **argv)
	{
		int sockfd;
		struct cipso cipso = {
			.type = IPOPT_CIPSO,
			.length = sizeof(struct cipso),
			.local = {
				.type = 128,
				.length = sizeof(struct local_tag),
			},
		};

		memset(cipso.doi, 0, 4);
		cipso.doi[3] = 3;

		sockfd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
		#define SOL_IP 0
		setsockopt(sockfd, SOL_IP, IP_OPTIONS,
			&cipso, sizeof(struct cipso));

		return 0;
	}

CC: Lin Ming <mlin@...pku.edu.cn>
Reported-by: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
---
 net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c |    6 ++++--
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c
index 039cc1f..10f8f8d 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c
@@ -1726,8 +1726,10 @@ int cipso_v4_validate(const struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned char **option)
 		case CIPSO_V4_TAG_LOCAL:
 			/* This is a non-standard tag that we only allow for
 			 * local connections, so if the incoming interface is
-			 * not the loopback device drop the packet. */
-			if (!(skb->dev->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK)) {
+			 * not the loopback device drop the packet. Further,
+			 * there is no legitimate reason for setting this from
+			 * userspace so reject it if skb is NULL. */
+			if (skb == NULL || !(skb->dev->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK)) {
 				err_offset = opt_iter;
 				goto validate_return_locked;
 			}
-- 
1.7.2.1.45.g54fbc



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/