linux-kernel - Re: The 10ms averager in fair.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <op.wljhky1q6426ze@millennium.getinternet.no>
Date:	Tue, 02 Oct 2012 08:56:48 +0200
From:	Uwaysi Bin Kareem <uwaysi.bin.kareem@...adoxuncreated.com>
To:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: The 10ms averager in fair.c

This is just too much code for me to do a quick patch on. It really needs  
to be evaulated with concerns to what an optimal scheduler is. That would  
be to operate on actual system load ofcourse, not a filtered system load  
that doesn`t represent what is actually happening on a computer.

What you can do for the time being is just set it to 1nS. If that doesn`t  
negatively impact anything, then you know it is bogus.

Peace Be With You.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/