linux-kernel - [ 120/180] futex: Fix bug in WARN_ON for NULL q.pi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20121001225202.699701161@1wt.eu>
Date:	Tue, 02 Oct 2012 00:53:57 +0200
From:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: [ 120/180] futex: Fix bug in WARN_ON for NULL q.pi_state

2.6.32-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>

commit f27071cb7fe3e1d37a9dbe6c0dfc5395cd40fa43 upstream.

The WARN_ON in futex_wait_requeue_pi() for a NULL q.pi_state was testing
the address (&q.pi_state) of the pointer instead of the value
(q.pi_state) of the pointer. Correct it accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1c85d97f6e5f79ec389a4ead3e367363c74bd09a.1342809673.git.dvhart@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
---
 kernel/futex.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index 6f745b6..7fd3dac 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -2318,7 +2318,7 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, int fshared,
 		 * signal.  futex_unlock_pi() will not destroy the lock_ptr nor
 		 * the pi_state.
 		 */
-		WARN_ON(!&q.pi_state);
+		WARN_ON(!q.pi_state);
 		pi_mutex = &q.pi_state->pi_mutex;
 		ret = rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(pi_mutex, to, &rt_waiter, 1);
 		debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&rt_waiter);
-- 
1.7.2.1.45.g54fbc



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/