linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen-two tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1210021240020.29232@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
Date:	Tue, 2 Oct 2012 12:45:01 +0100
From:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
To:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
CC:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen-two tree with Linus' tree

On Tue, 2 Oct 2012, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 02.10.12 at 12:44, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com> wrote:
> >> --- a/drivers/xen/Makefile
> >> +++ b/drivers/xen/Makefile
> >> @@@ -4,8 -8,11 +8,12 @@@ obj-y	+= xenbus
> >>   nostackp := $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
> >>   CFLAGS_features.o			:= $(nostackp)
> >>   
> >> + obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_DOM0)			+= $(dom0-y)
> >> + dom0-$(CONFIG_PCI) += pci.o
> >> ++dom0-$(CONFIG_X86) += dbgp.o
> >> + dom0-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += acpi.o
> >> + dom0-$(CONFIG_X86) += pcpu.o
> >>   obj-$(CONFIG_BLOCK)			+= biomerge.o
> >> - obj-$(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU)		+= cpu_hotplug.o
> >>   obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_XENCOMM)		+= xencomm.o
> >>   obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_BALLOON)		+= xen-balloon.o
> >>   obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_SELFBALLOONING)	+= xen-selfballoon.o
> >  
> > 
> > Considering that dbgp doesn't seem to be very useful without PCI at the
> > moment, could we just turn it into:
> > 
> > dom0-$(CONFIG_PCI) += dbgp.o
> > 
> > ?
> 
> Better not - the code is specifically not PCI-only. And I can't see
> how it would be harmful to be compiled on e.g. ARM (so the
> merge perhaps really should use XEN_DOM0 alone, without
> X86. If anything (and that may indeed be a minor oversight of
> the original patch) one might want it to depend on USB_SUPPORT,
> as without that no in-tree debug port capable driver would be
> able to load (and hence interfere with Xen's use of the debug
> port). However, as long as it builds fine with USB_SUPPORT
> undefined (which I believe it does), having it in the shape it
> is allows for out-of-tree drivers as well (as long as they make
> use of the designated interface).

OK for PCI.
Regarding USB_SUPPORT, considering that gbgp.c calls hcd_to_bus, I think
it would make sense to make it depend on it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/