linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen-two tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <506B0957020000780009F107@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date:	Tue, 02 Oct 2012 14:33:43 +0100
From:	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To:	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc:	"Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	"Stefano Stabellini" <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen-two tree with Linus'
 tree

>>> On 02.10.12 at 14:55, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 12:54:20PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 02.10.12 at 13:45, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com> 
> wrote:
>> >> > Considering that dbgp doesn't seem to be very useful without PCI at the
>> >> > moment, could we just turn it into:
>> >> > 
>> >> > dom0-$(CONFIG_PCI) += dbgp.o
>> >> > 
>> >> > ?
>> >> 
>> >> Better not - the code is specifically not PCI-only. And I can't see
>> >> how it would be harmful to be compiled on e.g. ARM (so the
>> >> merge perhaps really should use XEN_DOM0 alone, without
>> >> X86. If anything (and that may indeed be a minor oversight of
>> >> the original patch) one might want it to depend on USB_SUPPORT,
>> >> as without that no in-tree debug port capable driver would be
>> >> able to load (and hence interfere with Xen's use of the debug
>> >> port). However, as long as it builds fine with USB_SUPPORT
>> >> undefined (which I believe it does), having it in the shape it
>> >> is allows for out-of-tree drivers as well (as long as they make
>> >> use of the designated interface).
>> > 
>> > OK for PCI.
>> > Regarding USB_SUPPORT, considering that gbgp.c calls hcd_to_bus, I think
>> > it would make sense to make it depend on it.
>> 
>> As said - I'd prefer to do that only if indeed needed to get things
>> to build without that option. Since include/usb/* doesn't reference
>> CONFIG_USB_SUPPORT, I'm in favor of supporting at least those
>> eventual out-of-tree drivers that do use the pre-existing data
>> structures (and others shouldn't be calling pre-existing APIs
>> anyway). But I wouldn't NAK a patch doing what you suggest
>> either.
> 
> Could it depend on EARLY_PRINTK_DBGP ?

No, that one would definitely be wrong (because we need the
EHCI driver to propagate reset information no matter whether
the kernel uses an early console).

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/