[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121002221723.GX26488@google.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 15:17:23 -0700
From: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, tj@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v3 02/26] block: Convert integrity to
bvec_alloc_bs()
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 06:05:53PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:52:50PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 11:12:02AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 03:34:42PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > > This adds a pointer to the bvec array to struct bio_integrity_payload,
> > > > instead of the bvecs always being inline; then the bvecs are allocated
> > > > with bvec_alloc_bs().
> > >
> > > Ok, you are introducing bio_vec pointer in this patch. May be we can
> > > do it earlier so that we take care of bio pair related issue.
> >
> > I was just trying to make the bugfix patch small, since people
> > complained about too much stuff being done in one patch.
>
> Can't we introduce the pointer while we retain bip_slabs as it is. Then
> this patch will be small. I think this patch is big only because you
> are trying to allocate integrity vecs from bio_set out of line.
Ok - yeah, that makes sense to break out. I think I'll just make the
integrity stuff a separate patch series, it's going to be like 4 patches
now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists