[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1sj9w33mq.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 18:34:05 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
Cc: Zach Brown <zab@...bo.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, tytso@...gle.com, tj@...nel.org,
Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>,
Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>,
"Maxim V. Patlasov" <mpatlasov@...allels.com>,
michael.mesnier@...el.com, jeffrey.d.skirvin@...el.com,
Martin Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] Extensible AIO interface
>>>>> "Kent" == Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com> writes:
>> Hmm, careful here. I think that in DIF/DIX the checksums are
>> per-sector, not per IO, right? That'd mean that the PAGE_SIZE attr
>> limit in this patch would be magically creating different max IO size
>> limits on different architectures. That doesn't seem great.
Kent> Not just per sector, Per hardware sector.
Per logical block (or for some devices less).
Kent> For passing around checksums userspace would have to find out the
Kent> hardware sector size and checksum type/size via a different
Kent> interface,
The relevant information is already exported in sysfs. Including the
format, how many bytes of integrity metadata go with how many bytes of
data, etc.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists