[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121002225803.GT4763@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 00:58:03 +0200
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] mm: thp: Use more portable PMD clearing sequenece in
zap_huge_pmd().
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 06:27:41PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>
> Invalidation sequences are handled in various ways on various
> architectures.
>
> One way, which sparc64 uses, is to let the set_*_at() functions
> accumulate pending flushes into a per-cpu array. Then the
> flush_tlb_range() et al. calls process the pending TLB flushes.
>
> In this regime, the __tlb_remove_*tlb_entry() implementations are
> essentially NOPs.
>
> The canonical PTE zap in mm/memory.c is:
>
> ptent = ptep_get_and_clear_full(mm, addr, pte,
> tlb->fullmm);
> tlb_remove_tlb_entry(tlb, pte, addr);
>
> With a subsequent tlb_flush_mmu() if needed.
>
> Mirror this in the THP PMD zapping using:
>
> orig_pmd = pmdp_get_and_clear(tlb->mm, addr, pmd);
> page = pmd_page(orig_pmd);
> tlb_remove_pmd_tlb_entry(tlb, pmd, addr);
>
> And we properly accomodate TLB flush mechanims like the one described
> above.
Thanks for the explanation.
Reviewed-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists