lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue,  2 Oct 2012 16:48:51 -0700
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	acme@...hat.com, x86@...r.kernel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
	jolsa@...hat.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 31/31] perf, x86: Add a Haswell precise instructions event

From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>

Add a instructions-p event alias that uses the PDIR randomized instruction
retirement event. This is useful to avoid some systematic sampling shadow
problems. Normally PEBS sampling has a systematic shadow. With PDIR
enabled the hardware adds some randomization that statistically avoids
this problem. In this sense, it's more precise over a whole sampling
interval, but an individual sample can be less precise. But since we
sample overall it's a more precise event.

This could be used before using the explicit event code syntax, but it's easier
and more user friendly to use with an "instructions-p" alias. I expect
this will eventually become a common use case.

Right now for Haswell, will add to Ivy Bridge later too.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 67b7095..28534ae 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -2085,6 +2085,7 @@ PMU_EVENT(cycles_t,       "cycles-t",       "event=0x3c,intx=1");
 PMU_EVENT(cycles_ct,      "cycles-ct",      "event=0x3c,intx=1,intx_cp=1");
 PMU_EVENT(insns_t,        "instructions-t", "event=0xc0,intx=1");
 PMU_EVENT(insns_ct,       "instructions-ct","event=0xc0,intx=1,intx_cp=1");
+PMU_EVENT(insns_prec,     "instructions-p", "event=0xc0,umask=0x01,precise=2");
 
 #define PMU_EVENT_PTR(x) &attr_ ## x .attr.attr
 
@@ -2107,6 +2108,7 @@ static struct attribute *hsw_events_attrs[] = {
 	PMU_EVENT_PTR(cycles_ct),
 	PMU_EVENT_PTR(insns_t),
 	PMU_EVENT_PTR(insns_ct),
+	PMU_EVENT_PTR(insns_prec),
 	NULL
 };
 
-- 
1.7.7.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ