lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <506BE0E7.1070701@pobox.com>
Date:	Wed, 03 Oct 2012 02:53:27 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v0] Add SHA-3 hash algorithm

On 10/03/2012 02:06 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 01:45:42 -0400
>
>> 1) tcrypt setup blatantly wrong.  What is the best setup here?  Define a
>> separate entry for each digest length?  Is there some special string
>> descriptor format that is desired, like "sha3-256" or "sha3(256)"?
>
> Good question.  The base name should probably be something without
> dashes.  Maybe "sha3_256", but yeah "sha3256" would look rediculous.

Well, the more basic question was...  what to do when the digest length 
is easily variable, vis a vis kernel hash APIs?

Keccak message digest size may fall anywhere within the range 8 bits - 
1600 bits at runtime.  You choose the digest size when you init the 
context.  In contrast, the kernel interface appears to require a 
hardcoded size, chosen at driver compile time.

My patch picks sizes found in common use, consistent with existing 
kernel practice.  However, it is valid for another Keccak user to 
produce a 1600 bit hash, or a 1592 bit hash, or a 1584 bit hash, etc., etc.

Maybe my patch is the best we can do in the current kernel, if dynamic 
digest size is not currently possible. Register "sha3_224", "sha3_256", 
... as you describe, and wait for actual users to appear with 
unsupported digest sizes.

	Jeff



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ