[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <506BE0E7.1070701@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 02:53:27 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v0] Add SHA-3 hash algorithm
On 10/03/2012 02:06 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 01:45:42 -0400
>
>> 1) tcrypt setup blatantly wrong. What is the best setup here? Define a
>> separate entry for each digest length? Is there some special string
>> descriptor format that is desired, like "sha3-256" or "sha3(256)"?
>
> Good question. The base name should probably be something without
> dashes. Maybe "sha3_256", but yeah "sha3256" would look rediculous.
Well, the more basic question was... what to do when the digest length
is easily variable, vis a vis kernel hash APIs?
Keccak message digest size may fall anywhere within the range 8 bits -
1600 bits at runtime. You choose the digest size when you init the
context. In contrast, the kernel interface appears to require a
hardcoded size, chosen at driver compile time.
My patch picks sizes found in common use, consistent with existing
kernel practice. However, it is valid for another Keccak user to
produce a 1600 bit hash, or a 1592 bit hash, or a 1584 bit hash, etc., etc.
Maybe my patch is the best we can do in the current kernel, if dynamic
digest size is not currently possible. Register "sha3_224", "sha3_256",
... as you describe, and wait for actual users to appear with
unsupported digest sizes.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists