[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121003065959.GA4963@leaf>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 23:59:59 -0700
From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@...ox.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christopher Li <sparse@...isli.org>,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Pavel Pisa <pisa@....felk.cvut.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/10] compiler{,-gcc4}.h: Introduce __flatten function
attribute
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 11:49:03PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Josh Triplett wrote:
>
> > That issue doesn't relate to __flatten, though; it only relates to
> > __weak. Since __flatten (and __compiletime_object_size) will work fine
> > on 4.1.0 and 4.1.1, don't exclude them just because the definition for
> > __weak elsewhere in the file excludes them. That just makes it harder
> > for anyone who might want to work on the issue with __weak.
> >
>
> Nack to the patch since there are no users of it; there's no need to
> define every possible gcc function attribute. If anything actually needs
> to use __attribute__((flatten)), then it can introduce it.
This patch series started out as part of another patch series by Daniel
Santos that makes use of __flatten; I think Daniel plans to have that
patch series depend on this one. Thus, I think it makes sense to
introduce __flatten at this point.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists