linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/10] compiler{,-gcc4}.h: Introduce _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <506C1F8B.1070307@att.net>
Date:	Wed, 03 Oct 2012 06:20:43 -0500
From:	Daniel Santos <danielfsantos@....net>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@...ox.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christopher Li <sparse@...isli.org>,
	David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
	linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	Pavel Pisa <pisa@....felk.cvut.cz>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/10] compiler{,-gcc4}.h: Introduce __flatten function
 attribute

On 10/03/2012 02:53 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2012, Josh Triplett wrote:
>
>> This patch series started out as part of another patch series by Daniel
>> Santos that makes use of __flatten; I think Daniel plans to have that
>> patch series depend on this one.  Thus, I think it makes sense to
>> introduce __flatten at this point.
>>
>
> Daniel, please introduce __flatten in the patch series that uses it, 
> thanks.
That isn't going to work. I split my patches out into three sets
because, otherwise, the list of maintainers that must be CCed exceeds
the allowable size of the LKML server and my messages get tagged as
spam, causing untold confusion as messages reach maintainers, but not
the LKML.  Please note from the summary of this patch set
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/28/1136)
> This patch set is a dependency of the generic red-black tree patch set, which
> I have now split up into three smaller sets.
And the patch set this depends upon was submitted 9/28 as well
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/28/1183) and the summary starts with this
text:
> This patch set depends upon the following:
> * Cleanup & new features for compiler*.h and bug.h
> * kernel-doc bug fixes (for generating docs)
If I move this patch to the other patch set, scripts/get_maintainers.pl will give me a list longer than the LKML administrator will allow for recipients (1024 bytes max)


On 09/28/2012 12:46 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Daniel Santos <danielfsantos@....net>
> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:22:52 -0500
>
>> Hello. I'm trying to send a patch set and people in my TO list are
>> receiving the emails, but not the LKML.
> You can't have email fields larger than 1024 characters, that CC:
> list is way too large.  There is never any legitimate reason to
> CC: so many people, and we block such long email fields since
> %99.99999 they indicate spam.
If you have any other reasonable suggestions, please post them.

Thanks,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/